Browse Definitions

Understanding the Phrase 'Lesser of Two Evils': Meaning, History, and Usage

Explore the meaning, historical context, and contemporary relevance of the phrase 'lesser of two evils.' Learn how this expression is used in language and culture.

Lesser of Two Evils§

Definition§

The phrase “lesser of two evils” refers to a situation in which one must choose between two undesirable options, selecting the one that is perceived to be less harmful or objectionable than the other. It is often employed in moral, political, or ethical dilemmas where all available choices have negative consequences.

Etymology and Historical Context§

The origin of the phrase “lesser of two evils” can be traced back to the Latin proverb “minima de malis,” which translates to “the least of evils.” This concept has been present in Western thought for centuries, particularly within the context of ethical philosophy and decision-making. The phrase gained prominence in English usage during the 19th century, reflecting a common theme in moral reasoning and political discourse.

Semantic Analysis§

Semantically, the phrase “lesser of two evils” encapsulates the idea of a compromise or a pragmatic choice in the face of limited options. It implies a recognition of imperfection and an acceptance of a suboptimal outcome. The phrase carries connotations of resignation and practicality, often used when ideal solutions are unattainable.

Cultural and Social Usage§

In contemporary culture, the phrase “lesser of two evils” is frequently invoked in political debates, particularly during elections where voters must choose between candidates or policies that may not fully align with their values. It is also used in literature and film to depict characters facing moral quandaries.

For example, in the political realm, voters may express dissatisfaction with candidates by stating they are choosing the “lesser of two evils.” In literature, characters might be portrayed making difficult decisions that reflect this sentiment.

  • Choice between two evils
  • Least worst option
  • Hobson’s choice (though this implies no real choice at all)
  • No-win situation

Illustrative Examples§

  • In the upcoming election, many voters felt they were choosing the lesser of two evils, as neither candidate represented their ideals.
  • Faced with two undesirable job offers, she decided to accept the lesser of two evils.

Contextual Variations§

The phrase is often used in political contexts, where it highlights the pragmatic nature of voting or policy decisions. In social contexts, it may describe personal dilemmas where one must choose between two unfavorable outcomes. In literature, it serves to illustrate character development and moral complexity.

Contemporary Relevance and Durability§

The phrase “lesser of two evils” remains highly relevant in contemporary discourse, especially in political and ethical discussions. Its continued use reflects the persistent nature of complex decision-making scenarios in modern society. Durability rating: ★★★★★

Quotations§

“The lesser of two evils, or the least of the evils, is a phrase we often hear in political campaigns.” - Noam Chomsky, Understanding Power: The Indispensable Chomsky

“In politics, as on the sickbed, people toss from side to side, thinking they will be more comfortable.” - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Elective Affinities

Cross-References§

  • Choice between two evils: See the related entry for further exploration of similar decision-making scenarios.
  • Hobson’s choice: A situation where there is no real choice, often contrasted with the “lesser of two evils.”
Friday, March 28, 2025